Feedback

Pc Spencer V Pulido Esparza

1                                                                        
2                                                                        
3                                                                        
4                                                                        
5                                                                        
6                                                                        
7                                                                        
8                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                      
9                 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA                 
10                                                                        
11   EDWARD B. SPENCER,              Case No.  1:20-cv-01176-JLT-HBK (PC) 
12                Plaintiff,          CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING          
                                     ORDER                               
13        v.                                                              
                                     Exhaustion-Based Motion:  10/23/2025           
14   CDCR,                                                                
                                     Complete Non-Expert Discovery:  04/23/2026    
15                Defendant.                                              
                                     Settlement Report:  05/23/2026             
16                                                                        
                                     Dispositive Motion(s):  07/23/2026      
17                                                                        
18       Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, the Court further sets forth 
19  the following case management deadlines and discovery procedures for this case as follows: 
20       I.  Written Discovery:                                           
21       Discovery requests shall be served by the parties in compliance with Rule 5 of the Federal 
22  Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. P.) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 135.  
23  Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court unless required by Eastern 
24  District California Local Rules 250.2, 250.3 and 250.4.  Absent leave of Court, discovery is 
25  limited as follows:                                                   
26       A. The parties are limited to 15 Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a question sent by one 
27  party to another, to be answered under oath, in order to clarify matters of fact and “may relate to 
28  any matter that may be inquired into under Rule 26(b).”  Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2));     
1       B. The parties are limited to 15 Requests for Admission (a request for admission is a 
2  written request that the opposing party “admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth 
3  of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1)” that relate to “(A) facts, the application of law 
4  to fact, or opinions about either; [or] (B) the genuineness of any described documents.” Fed. R. 
5  Civ. P. 36(a)(1));                                                    
6       C.   The parties are limited to 15 Requests for Production (a request for production is a 
7  written request that the opposing party produce documents or electronically stored information, 
8  “including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other 
9  data or data compilations,” or a written request that the opposing party produce any designated 
10  tangible things. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1)).                           
11       Responses to documents shall include all documents within a party’s possession, custody, 
12  or control.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1).  Documents are deemed within a party’s possession, custody, 
13  or control if the party has actual possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to 
14  obtain the property on demand.  Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309945, at *2 (E.D. Cal. 2007). 
15       Responses to written discovery, including the production of documents, shall be due 
16  within forty-five (45) days after the request is served.  Boilerplate objections are disfavored and 
17  may be summarily overruled by the Court.  All discovery must be completed by the above-
18  referenced discovery cut-off date.                                    
19       The parties are required to act in good faith during discovery and are required to 
20  meet and confer, via correspondence or telephonically, to resolve any discovery dispute 
21  prior to filing any discovery motion.  Any motions to compel should be filed promptly after the 
22  non-receipt or receipt of the objectionable discovery; and, in all cases no later than fourteen (14) 
23  days before the non-expert discovery deadline expires.  Failure to timely file a motion to compel 
24  will result in a waiver of any objections to discovery.  The moving party must include 
25  certification that they have complied with their duty to meet and confer.  The failure to include a 
26  certification or show good cause for failure to meet and confer will result in the motion being 
27  stricken.  The fact that Plaintiff is incarcerated does not constitute good cause to excuse either 
28  parties’ duty to fulfill the meet and confer requirement.             
1       II.  Depositions                                                 
2        Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B), Defendants may depose Plaintiff and any other 
3  witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a 
4  deposition, Defendants serve all parties with the notice required by Rule 30(b)(1).  Pursuant to 
5  Fed. R, Civ. P. 30(b)(4), the parties may take any deposition under this section by video 
6  conference, relieving the court reporter of the requirement to be in the physical presence of the 
7  witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28(a)(1) during that deposition.  Nothing herein 
8  forecloses a party from bringing a motion for protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) 
9  if deemed necessary.                                                  
10       Disagreement with any directive of security staff at the institution or prison at which the 
11  deposition is scheduled is not a basis for the Plaintiff to refuse to answer questions.  Further, the 
12  failure of Plaintiff to attend, be sworn, or answer appropriate questions may result in sanctions, 
13  including terminating the action as provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.   
14       III.  Case Management Deadlines                                  
15       The following deadlines shall govern this action:                
16       A.  Deadline to challenge exhaustion of administrative remedies:  October 23, 2025. 
17       B.  Deadline to complete non-expert discovery:  April 23, 2026.  Any motions to compel 
18  must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days before the non-expert discovery deadline. The 
19  motion(s) should include a copy of the request(s) and any response to the request(s) at issue. The 
20  responding party may file a response to the motion no later than twenty-one days from the date 
21  the motion is filed.  If, after reviewing the motion(s) and response(s), the Court determines that a 
22  hearing will be helpful, the Court will set a hearing on the motion(s) to compel. 
23       C.  Deadline to Advise of Settlement Potential:  Defendant(s) shall confer with Plaintiff,1 
24  and no later than May 23, 2026, shall file a report indicating each party’s position on whether a  
25  settlement conference would be productive.2                           
26       D.  Deadline to file pre-trial dispositive motions:  July 23, 2026. The deadline to file 
27                                                                        
   1 The parties may confer by letter or telephonically.                 
28  2 If the parties request a settlement conference, the Court will stay the remaining deadlines.    
1  |  oppositions to dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment, is thirty (30) days 
2 |  from the date the motion is filed. The deadline to file replies to oppositions is fourteen (14) days 
3 |  from the date the opposition is filed.  If a party needs an extension to these deadlines, that party 
4 |  may file a motion for an extension of time. 
5          E.  In addition to complying with the applicable rules, a motion and incorporated 
6  | memorandum and any responses in opposition shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length, 
7  |  exclusive of exhibits.  A moving party’s reply brief shall not exceed seven (7) pages in length.  A 
8 || party must move and show good cause for exceeding these page limitations before filing a motion 
9  |  in excess of these pages.  Any motions filed in excess of these page limitations may be struck. 
10          F.  Defendants shall lodge a Word version of any dispositive motion to chambers at: 
11  |  hbkorders@caed.uscourts.gov and  shall mail or deliver courtesy hard-copies of any motions with 
12 |  exhibits that exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length to the Clerk of Court at 2500 Tulare St., 
13  |  Fresno, CA 93721 and marked “to the Attention of: HBK Chambers.”  Courtesy hard-copies shall 
14 |  reflect the CM/ECF document numbers and pagination. 
15          IV.  Further Dates and Deadlines 
16          If this case proceeds after dispositive motions have been resolved, or if no dispositive 
17  | motions are filed, the Court will set expert disclosure deadlines,? a telephonic trial confirmation 
18 |  hearing, pretrial deadlines, and a  trial date. 
19          V.  Effect of This Order 
20          The deadlines set forth above are firm and will only be extended upon a showing of good 
21  |  cause.  Eleventh hours motions, i.e., motions filed on the eve of the deadline expiration, to extend 
22  |  adeadline will only be granted only upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances. 
*3  |  Dated:  _ July 22, 2025                     Mile. Wh fareh  fackte 
24                                           HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 
35                                           UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

26 
27         
    3 While the Court is not setting a deadline for expert disclosures at this time, the parties may provide their 
28    expert disclosures at any time.