Feedback

Quince V Ramos

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK                                              
---------------------------------------------------------------X          
LAISOHN J. QUINCE,                      NOT FOR PUBLICATION               

          Plaintiff,                    ORDER                        

-against-                          23-CV-8185 (LDH)(LB)              

JORGE RAMOS, Detective of the NYPD PSA 3                                  
Precinct; MOHAMMAD ABDELFATTAH, of the                                    
NYPD PSA E Precinct; and NYPD PSA 3                                       
PRECINCT,                                                                 

          Defendants.                                                
---------------------------------------------------------------X          
LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge:                        
Plaintiff Laisohn J. Quince, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on October 31, 
2023.  (Compl., ECF No. 1.)  Plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee or an adequate application 
to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).  By Order entered April 24, 2025, the Court gave Plaintiff 
30 days within which to submit the filing fee or a completed IFP application and warned that 
failure to file would result in dismissal of the action.  The Court mailed the Order to the address 
Plaintiff had provided: 7 Livonia Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11212, but the United States Postal 
Service returned the mail as undeliverable on April 30, 2025.  (ECF No. 8.) 
More than 30 days have elapsed, and Plaintiff still has not submitted the filing fee or an 
application to proceed IFP or provided the Court with a new address.  It is Plaintiff’s responsibility 
to provide the Court with a change of address.  See Citak v. More Consulting Corp., No. 17-CV-
6049, 2018 WL 5311411, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2018) (collecting cases). Accordingly, the 
action is dismissed without prejudice.                                    
The Clerk of Court is requested to close this case and to send a copy of this Order to 
Plaintiff at the address provided.  The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any 
appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the 
purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962). 
                                   SO ORDERED.                       

Dated: Brooklyn, New York               /s/ LDH                           
July 22, 2025                      LASHANN DEARCY HALL               
                                   United States District Judge