Williams V San Patricio County Court At Law 2
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
July 22, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner. Clerk
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
CODDEY CLINTON WILLIAMS, §
§
Plaintiff, §
V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00109
§
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY COURT AT LAW §
2, §
§
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the case
without prejudice for failure to prosecute. /d. at 2.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Having reviewed the proposed
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the
applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court
ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. (D.E. 1). A final judgr ill issue/Separ. 4 ely.
/
SO ORDERED. / f
DAVIDS “MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
July 2/97, 2025
1/1]