Feedback

Rodriguez Morales V Joseph

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                              
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK                                             
ENKI RODRIGUEZ-MORALES,                                                   
                   Plaintiff,                                            
                                         24-CV-9767 (LTS)                
            -against-                                                    
                                             ORDER                       
FBI AGENT JOSEPH, et al.,                                                 
                   Defendants.                                           
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:                   
    On January 29, 2025, the Court dismissed the complaint filed in this action for failure to 
state a claim and granted Plaintiff 30 days’ leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff did not 
file an amended complaint, and the Clerk of Court entered judgment on March 26, 2025. (ECF 
10) (modified on Apr. 7, 205). On April 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma 
pauperis and an amended complaint. By order dated April 7, 2025, the Court liberally construed 
the amended complaint as including a motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) of the 
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a motion for reconsideration under Local Civil Rule 6.3, and a 
motion for relief from a judgment or order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and denied the motion. 
    On May 9, 2025, Plaintiff filed three more motions asking for a court date and the 
issuance of arrest warrants. (ECF 15-17.) The Court denies these motions. This action is closed. 
These motions do not include any facts or arguments suggesting that the judgment entered in this 
case should be reconsidered under Rule 60(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate these 
motions.                                                                  
    The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would 
not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an  
appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).       
SO ORDERED.                                                               
Dated:  July 22, 2025                                                    
      New York, New York                                                 

                                   /s/ Laura Taylor Swain                
                                      LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN                 
                                    Chief United States District Judge