Feedback

Torres V Patricias Morris Park Corp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                              
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK                                             
---------------------------------------------------------------X          
BRAYNIEL TORRES, individually and on  :                                   
behalf of others similarly situated,  :                                   
                              :                                      
                Plaintiff,    :       23-CV-7820 (RWL)               
                              :                                      
    - against -               :                                      
                              :  ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT          
PATRICIAS MORRIS PARK CORP., a New  :    AND DISMISSING CASE              
York corporation and PATRICIA      :                                      
BORGOGNONE, an individual,         :                                      
                              :                                      
                Defendants.   :                                      
---------------------------------------------------------------X          
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge.                     

This case is an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 
§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law.  Before the Court is the parties’ joint 
letter  request  that  the  Court  approve  their  settlement  agreement  (the  “Settlement 
Agreement”), a fully executed copy of which was submitted on July 21, 2025.  A federal 
court is obligated to determine whether settlement of an FLSA case under the court’s 
consideration is fair and reasonable and the subject of an arm’s length negotiation, not 
an employer’s overreaching.  See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d 
Cir. 2015).                                                               
The Court assisted the parties in mediating resolution of this case and has carefully 
reviewed the Settlement Agreement as well as the parties’ letter.  The Court has taken 
into account, without limitation, prior proceedings in this action; the attendant risks, 
burdens, and costs associated with continuing the action; the range of possible recovery; 
whether the Settlement Agreement is the product of arm’s length bargaining between 
experienced counsel or parties; the amount of attorney’s fees; and the possibility of fraud 
or  collusion.   Among  other  attributes  of  the  Settlement  Agreement,  there  are  no 
confidentiality  restrictions  or  non-disparagement  provisions;  the  Plaintiffs  release  is 
narrowly  tailored  to  wage  and  hour  claims;  and  the  attorneys’  fees  are  within a  fair, 
reasonable, and acceptable range.  Considering all the circumstances, the Court finds 
that the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable and hereby approved. 
 This case, having resolved by settlement, is hereby dismissed and discontinued in 
its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party, except as provided for in the 
parties’ settlement agreement.  The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate 
all motions and deadlines, and close this case. 
                               SO ORDERED. 
                               = 
                               UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Dated: July 22, 2025 
 New York, New York 
Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.