Feedback

Howard V Chase

         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                
        EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN                                


JOSEPH L. HOWARD,                                                         

               Petitioner,                                           

     v.                            Case No. 25-CV-1062               

DAISY CHASE,                                                              

               Respondent.                                           


ORDER ON THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS                         


Joseph  L.  Howard,  who  is  incarcerated  pursuant  to  the  judgment  of  a 
Wisconsin Circuit Court, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.    
Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases states:             
If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that 
the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge 
must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner. 
If the petition is not dismissed, the judge must order the respondent to 
file an answer, motion, or other response within a fixed time, or to take 
other action the judge may order.                                    

Howard has pursued relief in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and Wisconsin 
Supreme Court (ECF No. 1 at 2) and therefore has plausibly exhausted his state 
court remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). There is no indication that he has 
previously  sought  federal  habeas  relief.  See  28  U.S.C.  §  2244(b).  His  petition 
contains at least one plausibly cognizable claim. And it appears that he filed his 
petition within one year of the Wisconsin Supreme Court denial of his request for 
review. (ECF Nos. 1 at 3; 1-1 at 1); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); Sup. Ct. R. 13; 
Anderson v. Litscher, 281 F.3d 672, 675 (7th Cir. 2002). Consequently, the court is 
unable to say that it is plainly apparent that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. 

The respondent shall answer the petition.                                 
The Clerk of Court shall promptly serve the respondent by service of a copy of 
the petition and this order upon the State of Wisconsin Attorney General.  
No later than 60 days after this order, the respondent shall answer the 
petition in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. 
Howard shall then submit a brief in support of his petition no later than 28 days 
thereafter. The respondent shall submit a brief in opposition no later than  28 

days thereafter. Howard may reply no later than 21 days thereafter.       
Alternatively, the respondent may move to dismiss Howard’s petition no later 
than 60 days after this order. In the event the respondent moves to dismiss the 
petition, Howard shall respond to that motion no later than 28 days thereafter. 
The respondent may then reply no later than 28 days thereafter.           
Unless the court determines that additional proceedings are necessary, this 

shall conclude the briefing. The court will then resolve the petition on the written 
record.                                                                   
All of the petitioner’s filings with the court shall be mailed to the following 
address:                                                                  
Clerk of Court                                                       
Jefferson Court Building                                             
125 S. Jefferson St - Room 102                                       
Green Bay, WI 54301-4541                                             
DO NOT MAIL ANYTHING DIRECTLY TO CHAMBERS.                           
The petitioner should also retain a personal copy of each document.  
The petitioner is further advised that the failure to comply with all deadlines 
in this matter may have serious consequences, which may include the loss of certain 
rights or the dismissal of this action.                                   
In addition, the petitioner must immediately notify the Clerk of Court of any 

change of address. Failure to do so could result in orders or other information not 
being timely delivered, thus affecting the legal rights of the parties.   
SO ORDERED.                                                          

Dated at Green Bay, Wisconsin this 23rd day of July, 2025.           

                              s/ Byron B. Conway                     
                              BYRON B. CONWAY                        
                              United States District Judge